Paper detail

New Bounds for the Extreme and the Star Discrepancy of Double-Infinite Matrices

According to Aistleitner and Weimar, there exist two-dimensional (double) infinite matrices whose star-discrepancy $D_N^{*s}$ of the first $N$ rows and $s$ columns, interpreted as $N$ points in $[0,1]^s$, satisfies an inequality of the form $$D_N^{*s} \leq \sqrtα \sqrt{A+B\frac{\ln(\log_2(N))}{s}}\sqrt{\frac{s}{N}}$$ with $α= ζ^{-1}(2) \approx 1.73, A=1165$ and $B=178$. These matrices are obtained by using i.i.d sequences, and the parameters $s$ and $N$ refer to the dimension and the sample size respectively. In this paper, we improve their result in two directions: First, we change the character of the equation so that the constant $A$ gets replaced by a value $A_s$ dependent on the dimension $s$ such that for $s>1$ we have $A_s<A$. Second, we generalize the result to the case of the (extreme) discrepancy. The paper is complemented by a section where we show numerical results for the dependence of the parameter $A_s$ on $s$.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.