Paper detail

New bounds and constructions for constant weighted $X$-codes

As a crucial technique for integrated circuits (IC) test response compaction, $X$-compact employs a special kind of codes called $X$-codes for reliable compressions of the test response in the presence of unknown logic values ($X$s). From a combinatorial view point, Fujiwara and Colbourn \cite{FC2010} introduced an equivalent definition of $X$-codes and studied $X$-codes of small weights that have good detectability and $X$-tolerance. An $(m,n,d,x)$ $X$-code is an $m\times n$ binary matrix with column vectors as its codewords. The parameters $d,x$ correspond to the test quality of the code. In this paper, bounds and constructions for constant weighted $X$-codes are investigated. First, we obtain a general result on the maximum number of codewords $n$ for an $(m,n,d,x)$ $X$-code of weight $w$, and we further improve this lower bound for the case with $x=2$ and $w=3$ through the probabilistic method. Then, using tools from additive combinatorics and finite fields, we present some explicit constructions for constant weighted $X$-codes with $d=3,7$ and $x=2$, which are optimal for the case when $d=3, w=4$ and nearly optimal for the case when $d=3,w=3$. We also consider a special class of $X$-codes introduced in \cite{FC2010} and improve the best known lower bound on the maximum number of codewords for this kind of $X$-codes.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.