Paper detail

New and updated convex shape models of asteroids based on optical data from a large collaboration network

Asteroid modeling efforts in the last decade resulted in a comprehensive dataset of almost 400 convex shape models and their rotation states. This amount already provided a deep insight into physical properties of main-belt asteroids or large collisional families. We aim to increase the number of asteroid shape models and rotation states. Such results are an important input for various further studies such as analysis of asteroid physical properties in different populations, including smaller collisional families, thermophysical modeling, and scaling shape models by disk-resolved images, or stellar occultation data. This provides, in combination with known masses, bulk density estimates, but constrains also theoretical collisional and evolutional models of the Solar System. We use all available disk-integrated optical data (i.e., classical dense-in-time photometry obtained from public databases and through a large collaboration network as well as sparse-in-time individual measurements from a few sky surveys) as an input for the convex inversion method, and derive 3D shape models of asteroids, together with their rotation periods and orientations of rotation axes. The key ingredient is the support of more that one hundred observers who submit their optical data to publicly available databases. We present updated shape models for 36 asteroids, for which mass estimates are currently available in the literature or their masses will be most likely determined from their gravitational influence on smaller bodies, which orbital deflection will be observed by the ESA Gaia astrometric mission. This was achieved by using additional optical data from recent apparitions for the shape optimization. Moreover, we also present new shape model determinations for 250 asteroids, including 13 Hungarias and 3 near-Earth asteroids.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
J. HanušJ. ĎurechD. A. OszkiewiczR. BehrendB. CarryM. Delbo'O. AdamV. AfoninaR. AnquetinP. AntoniniL. ArnoldM. AudejeanP. AurardM. BachschmidtB. BadueE. BarbotinP. BarroyP. BaudouinL. BerardN. BergerL. BernasconiJ-G. BoschS. BouleyI. BozhinovaJ. BrinsfieldL. BrunettoG. CanaudJ. CaronF. CarrierG. CasalnuovoS. CasulliM. CerdaL. ChalametS. CharbonnelB. ChinagliaA. CikotaF. ColasJ-F. ColiacA. ColletJ. ColomaM. ConjatE. ConseilR. CostaR. CrippaM. CristofanelliY. DamerdjiA. DebackereA. DecockQ. DéhaisT. DéléageS. DelmelleC. DemeautisM. DróżdżG. DubosT. DulcamaraM. DumontR. DurkeeR. DymockA. Escalante del ValleN. EsseivaR. EsseivaM. EstebanT. FauchezM. FauerbachM. FauvaudS. FauvaudE. FornéC. FournelD. FradetJ. GarlitzO. GerteisC. GillierM. GillonR. GiraudJ-P. GodardR. GoncalvesH. HamanowaK. HayS. HellmichS. HeterierD. HigginsR. HirschG. HodosanM. HrenA. HygateN. InnocentH. JacquinotS. JawaharE. JehinL. JerosimicA. KlotzW. KoffP. KorlevicE. KosturkiewiczP. KrafftY. KruglyF. KugelO. LabrevoirJ. LecacheuxM. LehkýA. LeroyB. LesquerbaultM. J. Lopez-GonzalesM. LutzB. MallecotJ. ManfroidF. ManziniA. MarciniakA. MartinB. ModaveR. MontaigutJ. MontierE. MorelleB. MortonS. MottolaR. NavesJ. NomenJ. OeyW. OgłozaM. PaiellaH. PallaresA. PeyrotF. PilcherJ-F. PirenneP. PironM. PolinskaM. PolottoR. PoncyJ. P. PrevitF. ReignierD. RenauldD. RicciF. RichardC. RinnerV. RisoldiD. RobilliardD. RomeufG. RousseauR. RoyJ. RuthroffP. A. SalomL. SalvadorS. SanchezT. Santana-RosA. ScholzG. SénéB. SkiffK. SobkowiakP. SogorbF. SoldánA. SpiridakisE. SplanskaS. SposettiD. StarkeyR. StephensA. StiepenR. StossJ. StrajnicJ-P. TengG. TumoloA. VagnozziB. VanoutryveJ. M. VugnonB. D. WarnerM. WaucomontO. WertzM. WiniarskiM. Wolf
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

J. HanušJ. ĎurechD. A. OszkiewiczR. BehrendB. CarryM. Delbo'O. AdamV. AfoninaR. AnquetinP. AntoniniL. ArnoldM. AudejeanP. AurardM. BachschmidtB. BadueE. BarbotinP. BarroyP. BaudouinL. BerardN. BergerL. BernasconiJ-G. BoschS. BouleyI. BozhinovaJ. BrinsfieldL. BrunettoG. CanaudJ. CaronF. CarrierG. CasalnuovoS. CasulliM. CerdaL. ChalametS. CharbonnelB. ChinagliaA. CikotaF. ColasJ-F. ColiacA. ColletJ. ColomaM. ConjatE. ConseilR. CostaR. CrippaM. CristofanelliY. DamerdjiA. DebackereA. DecockQ. DéhaisT. DéléageS. DelmelleC. DemeautisM. DróżdżG. DubosT. DulcamaraM. DumontR. DurkeeR. DymockA. Escalante del ValleN. EsseivaR. EsseivaM. EstebanT. FauchezM. FauerbachM. FauvaudS. FauvaudE. FornéC. FournelD. FradetJ. GarlitzO. GerteisC. GillierM. GillonR. GiraudJ-P. GodardR. GoncalvesH. HamanowaK. HayS. HellmichS. HeterierD. HigginsR. HirschG. HodosanM. HrenA. HygateN. InnocentH. JacquinotS. JawaharE. JehinL. JerosimicA. KlotzW. KoffP. KorlevicE. KosturkiewiczP. KrafftY. KruglyF. KugelO. LabrevoirJ. LecacheuxM. LehkýA. LeroyB. LesquerbaultM. J. Lopez-GonzalesM. LutzB. MallecotJ. ManfroidF. ManziniA. MarciniakA. MartinB. ModaveR. MontaigutJ. MontierE. MorelleB. MortonS. MottolaR. NavesJ. NomenJ. OeyW. OgłozaM. PaiellaH. PallaresA. PeyrotF. PilcherJ-F. PirenneP. PironM. PolinskaM. PolottoR. PoncyJ. P. PrevitF. ReignierD. RenauldD. RicciF. RichardC. RinnerV. RisoldiD. RobilliardD. RomeufG. RousseauR. RoyJ. RuthroffP. A. SalomL. SalvadorS. SanchezT. Santana-RosA. ScholzG. SénéB. SkiffK. SobkowiakP. SogorbF. SoldánA. SpiridakisE. SplanskaS. SposettiD. StarkeyR. StephensA. StiepenR. StossJ. StrajnicJ-P. TengG. TumoloA. VagnozziB. VanoutryveJ. M. VugnonB. D. WarnerM. WaucomontO. WertzM. WiniarskiM. Wolf

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.