Paper detail

Neutron star properties and the equation of state for its core

Few unified equations of state for neutron star matter where core and crust are described using the same nuclear model are available. However the use of non-unified equations of state with a simplified matching between the crust and the core has been shown to introduce uncertainties in the radius determination which can be larger than the expected precision of the next generation of X-ray satellites. We aim at eliminating the dependence of the radius and mass of neutron staron the detailed model for the crust and on the crust-core matching procedure. We solve the approximate equations of the hydrostatic equilibrium for the crust of neutron stars obtaining a precise formula for the radius which depends only on the core mass and radius, and on the baryon chemical potential at the core-crust interface and on the crust surface. For a fully accreted crust one needs additionally the value of the total deep crustal heating per one accreted nucleon. For typical neutron star masses the approximate approach allows to determine the neutron star radius with an error ~0.1% (~ 10 m, equivalent to a 1% inaccuracy in the crust thickness). The formalism applies to neutron stars with a catalyzed or a fully accreted crust. The difference in the neutron star radius between the two models is proportional to the total energy release due to deep crustal heating. For a given model of dense matter describing the neutron star core, the radius of a neutron star can be accurately determined independently of the crust model with a precision much better than the ~5% one expected from the next generation of X-ray satellites. This allows to circumvent the problem of the radius uncertainty which may arise when non-unified equations of state for the crust and the core are used.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.