Paper detail

Neutron star parameter constraints for accretion-powered millisecond pulsars from the simulated IXPE data

We have simulated the X-ray polarization data that can be obtained with the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer, when observing accretion-powered millisecond pulsars. We estimated the necessary exposure times for SAX J1808.4$-$3658 in order to obtain different accuracies in the measured time-dependent Stokes profiles integrated over all energy channels. We found that the measured relative errors depend strongly on the relative configuration of the observer and the emitting hotspot. The improvement in the minimum relative error in Stokes $Q$ and $U$ parameters as a function of observing time $t$ scales as $1/\sqrt{t}$, and spans the range from 30-90% with 200 ks exposure time to 20-60% with 500 ks exposure time (in case of data binned in 19 phase bins). The simulated data were also used to predict how accurate measurements of the geometrical parameters of the neutron star can be made when modelling only $Q$ and $U$ parameters, but not the flux. We found that the observer inclination and the hotspot co-latitude could be determined with better than 10 deg accuracy for most of the cases we considered. These measurements can be used to further constrain neutron star mass and radius when combined with modelling of the X-ray pulse profile.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.