Paper detail

Neutron-Rich Freeze-Out in Viscously Spreading Accretion Disks Formed from Compact Object Mergers

Accretion disks with masses ~0.001-0.1 Msun form during the merger of neutron star (NS)-NS and black hole-NS binaries. Initially, such hyper-accreting disks cool efficiently by neutrino emission and their composition is driven neutron-rich by pair captures under degenerate conditions. However, as the disk viscously spreads and its temperature drops, cooling becomes inefficient and the disk becomes advective. Analytic arguments and numerical simulations suggest that once this occurs, powerful winds likely drive away most of the disk's remaining mass. We calculate the thermal evolution and nuclear composition of viscously spreading accretion disks formed from compact object mergers using one-dimensional height-integrated simulations. We show that freeze-out from weak equilibrium necessarily accompanies the disk's late-time transition to an advective state. As a result, hyper-accreting disks generically freeze out neutron-rich (with electron fraction Ye ~ 0.2-0.4), and their late-time outflows robustly synthesize rare neutron-rich isotopes. Using the measured abundances of these isotopes in our solar system, we constrain the compact object merger rate in the Milky Way to be < 1e-5 (M_d,0/0.1 Msun)^(-1) per year, where M_d,0 is the average initial mass of the accretion disk. Thus, either the NS-NS merger rate is at the low end of current estimates or the average disk mass produced during a typical merger is << 0.1 Msun. We also show that if most short duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are produced by compact object mergers, their beaming fraction must exceed f_b ~ 0.13(M_d,0/0.1 Msun), corresponding to a jet half-opening angle > 30(M_d,0/0.1 Msun)^(1/2) degrees. This is consistent with other evidence that short duration GRB outflows are less collimated than those produced in long duration GRBs.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.