Paper detail

Neutron-capture elements in dwarf galaxies II: Challenges for the s- and i-processes at low metallicity

The slow ($s$) and intermediate ($i$) neutron ($n$) capture processes occur both in asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars, and in massive stars. To study the build-up of the $s$- and $i$-products at low metallicity, we investigate the abundances of Y, Ba, La, Nd, and Eu in 98 stars, at $-2.4<\text{[Fe/H]}<-0.9$, in the Sculptor dwarf spheroidal galaxy. The chemical enrichment from AGB stars becomes apparent at $\text{[Fe/H]}\approx-2$ in Sculptor, and causes [Y/Ba], [La/Ba], [Nd/Ba] and [Eu/Ba] to decrease with metallicity, reaching subsolar values at the highest $\text{[Fe/H]}\approx-1$. To investigate individual nucleosynthetic sites, we compared three $n$-rich Sculptor stars with theoretical yields. One carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP-no) star with high $\text{[Sr, Y, Zr]}>+0.7$ is best fit with a model of a rapidly-rotating massive star, the second (likely CH star) with the $i$-process, while the third has no satisfactory fit. For a more general understanding of the build-up of the heavy elements, we calculate for the first time the cumulative contribution of the $s$- and $i$-processes to the chemical enrichment in Sculptor, and compare with theoretical predictions. By correcting for the $r$-process, we derive $\text{[Y/Ba]}_{s/i}=-0.85\pm0.16$, $\text{[La/Ba]}_{s/i}=-0.49\pm0.17$, and $\text{[Nd/Ba]}_{s/i}=-0.48\pm0.12$, in the overall $s$- and/or $i$-process in Sculptor. These abundance ratios are within the range of those of CEMP stars in the Milky Way, which have either $s$- or $i$-process signatures. The low $\text{[Y/Ba]}_{s/i}$ and $\text{[La/Ba]}_{s/i}$ that we measure in Sculptor are inconsistent with them arising from the $s$-process only, but are more compatible with models of the $i$-process. Thus we conclude that both the $s$- and $i$-processes were important for the build-up of $n$-capture elements in the Sculptor dwarf spheroidal galaxy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.