Paper detail

Neutrino spectra evolution during proto-neutron star deleptonization

The neutrino-driven wind, which occurs after the onset of a core-collapse supernova explosion, has long been considered as the possible site for the synthesis of heavy r-process elements in the Universe. Only recently, it has been possible to simulate supernova explosions up to ~10 seconds, based on three-flavor Boltzmann neutrino transport. These simulations show that the neutrino luminosities and spectra of all flavors are very similar and their difference even decreases during the deleptonization of the proto-neutron star. As a consequence, the ejecta are always proton rich which rules out the possible production of heavy r-process elements (Z>56). We perform a detailed analysis of the different weak processes that determine the neutrino spectra. Non-electron flavor (anti)neutrinos are produced and interact only via neutral-current processes, while electron (anti)neutrinos have additional contributions from charge-current processes. The latter are dominated by ve absorption on neutrons and anti-ve absorption on protons. At early times, charge-current processes are responsible for spectral differences between. However, as the region of neutrino decoupling moves to higher densities during deleptonization, charge-current reactions are suppressed by final state Pauli-blocking. anti-ve absorption on protons is suppressed due to the continuously increasing chemical potential of the neutrons. ve absorption on neutrons is blocked by the increasing degeneracy of the electrons. These effects result in negligible contributions from charge-current reactions on timescales on the order of tens of seconds, depending on the progenitor star. Hence, the neutrino spectra are mainly determined from neutral-current processes which do not distinguish between the different flavors and results in the convergence of the spectra. These findings are independent of the charge-current reaction rates used...

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.