Paper detail

Neutrino oscillations in the front form of Hamiltonian dynamics

Since future, precise theory of neutrino oscillations should include the understanding of the neutrino mass generation and a precise, relativistic description of hadrons, and observing that such a future theory may require Dirac's FF of Hamiltonian dynamics, we provide a preliminary FF description of neutrino oscillations using the Feynman--Gell-Mann-Levy version of an effective theory in which leptons interact directly with whole nucleons and pions, instead of with quarks via intermediate bosons. The interactions are treated in the lowest-order perturbative expansion in the coupling constants in the effective theory, including a perturbative solution of the coupled constraint equations. Despite missing quarks and their binding mechanism, the effective Hamiltonian description is sufficiently precise for showing that the standard oscillation formula results from the interference of amplitudes with different neutrinos in virtual intermediate states. This holds provided that the inherent experimental uncertainties of preparing beams of incoming and measuring rates of production of outgoing particles are large enough for all of the different neutrino intermediate states to contribute as alternative virtual paths through which the long-baseline scattering process can manifest itself. The result that an approximate, effective FF theory reproduces the standard oscillation formula at the level of transition rates for currently considered long-baseline experiments--even though the space-time development of scattering is traced differently and the relevant interaction Hamiltonians are constructed differently than in the commonly used IF of dynamics--has two implications. It shows that the common interpretation of experimental results is not the only one, and it opens the possibility of considering more precise theories taking advantage of the features of the FF that are not available in the IF.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.