Paper detail

Neutrino masses from SUSY breaking in radiative seesaw models

Radiatively generated neutrino masses ($m_ν$) are proportional to supersymmetry (SUSY) breaking, as a result of the SUSY non-renormalisation theorem. In this work, we investigate the space of SUSY radiative seesaw models with regard to their dependence on SUSY breaking ($\require{cancel}\cancel{\text{SUSY}}$). In addition to contributions from sources of $\cancel{\text{SUSY}}$ that are involved in electroweak symmetry breaking ($\cancel{\text{SUSY}}_\text{EWSB}$ contributions), and which are manifest from $\langle F^\dagger_H \rangle = μ\langle \bar H \rangle \neq 0$ and $\langle D \rangle = g \sum_H \langle H^\dagger \otimes_H H \rangle \neq 0$, radiatively generated $m_ν$ can also receive contributions from $\cancel{\text{SUSY}}$ sources that are unrelated to EWSB ($\cancel{\text{SUSY}}_\text{EWS}$ contributions). We point out that recent literature overlooks pure-$\cancel{\text{SUSY}}_\text{EWSB}$ contributions ($\propto μ/ M$) that can arise at the same order of perturbation theory as the leading order contribution from $\cancel{\text{SUSY}}_\text{EWS}$. We show that there exist realistic radiative seesaw models in which the leading order contribution to $m_ν$ is proportional to $\cancel{\text{SUSY}}_\text{EWS}$. To our knowledge no model with such a feature exists in the literature. We give a complete description of the simplest model-topologies and their leading dependence on $\cancel{\text{SUSY}}$. We show that in one-loop realisations $L L H H$ operators are suppressed by at least $μ\, m_\text{soft} / M^3$ or $m_\text{soft}^2 / M^3$. We construct a model example based on a one-loop type-II seesaw. An interesting aspect of these models lies in the fact that the scale of soft-$\cancel{\text{SUSY}}$ effects generating the leading order $m_ν$ can be quite small without conflicting with lower limits on the mass of new particles.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.