Paper detail

Neutrino masses and oscillations

A report on neutrino masses, mixing and oscillations, made in Dubna at the symposium dedicated to 100 years of the Rutherford's discovery of atomic nucleus, is presented. We start with the hypothesis of neutrino which was proposed by W. Pauli in December 1930 in order to solve some problems of nuclei (the problem of spin of $^{7}N_{14}$ and other nuclei and the problem of continuous $β$-spectra). After that we consider the theory of massless two-component neutrino and first ideas of neutrino oscillations which were put forward by B. Pontecorvo in Dubna in 1957-58. The present status of neutrino mixing and oscillations is briefly reviewed. The seesaw mechanism of the generation of small Majorana neutrino masses is discussed and neutrinoless double $β$-decay of nuclei is considered. A possibility to probe the Majorana mass mechanism of the $0νββ$-decay is discussed.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.