Paper detail

Neutrino masses and mixing in $A_5$ with flavour antisymmetry

We discuss consequences of assuming that the (Majorana) neutrino mass matrix $M_ν$ and the charged lepton mass matrix $M_l$ satisfy, $S_ν^T M_νS_ν=-M_ν~,T_l^\dagger M_lM_l^\dagger T_l=M_lM_l^\dagger$ with respect to some discrete groups $S_ν,T_l$ contained in $A_5$. These assumptions lead to a neutrino mass spectrum with two degenerate and one massless neutrino and also constrain mixing among them. We derive possible mixing patterns following from the choices $S_ν=Z_2,~ Z_2\times Z_2$ and $T_l=Z_2, ~ Z_2\times Z_2, ~Z_3, ~Z_5$ as subgroups of $A_5$. One predicts the maximal atmospheric neutrino mixing angle $θ_{23}$ and $μ$-$τ$ reflection symmetry in large number of cases but it is also possible to obtain non-maximal values for $θ_{23}$. Only the third column of the neutrino mixing matrix can be obtained at the leading order due to degeneracy in masses of two of the neutrinos. We take up a specific example within $A_5$ group and identify Higgs vacuum expectations values which realize the above assumptions. Non-leading terms present in this example are shown to lead to splitting among degenerate pairs and a consistent description of both neutrino masses and mixing angles.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.