Paper detail

Neutrino Mass Inference from SZ Surveys

The growth of structure in the universe begins at the time of radiation-matter equality, which corresponds to energy scales of $\sim 0.4 eV$. All tracers of dark matter evolution are expected to be sensitive to neutrino masses on this and smaller scales. Here we explore the possibility of using cluster number counts and power spectrum obtained from ongoing SZ surveys to constrain neutrino masses. Specifically, we forecast the capability of ongoing measurements with the PLANCK satellite and the ground-based SPT experiment, as well as measurements with the proposed EPIC satellite, to set interesting bounds on neutrino masses from their respective SZ surveys. We also consider an ACT-like CMB experiment that covers only a few hundred ${\rm deg^{2}}$ also to explore the tradeoff between the survey area and sensitivity and what effect this may have on inferred neutrino masses. We find that for such an experiment a shallow survey is preferable over a deep and low-noise scanning scheme. We also find that projected results from the PLANCK SZ survey can, in principle, be used to determine the total neutrino mass with a ($1σ$) uncertainty of $0.28 eV$, if the detection limit of a cluster is set at the $5σ$ significance level. This is twice as large as the limits expected from PLANCK CMB lensing measurements. The corresponding limits from the SPT and EPIC surveys are $\sim 0.44 eV$ and $\sim 0.12 eV$, respectively. Mapping an area of 200 deg$^{2}$, ACT measurements are predicted to attain a $1σ$ uncertainty of 0.61 eV; expanding the observed area to 4,000 deg$^{2}$ will decrease the uncertainty to 0.36 eV.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.