Paper detail

Neutrino interactions at COMET

The experimental search for coherent neutrinoless conversion of muon to electron in the presence of a nucleus, aims to probe the possibility of charged lepton flavour violation. The COMET experiment at J-PARC is one such setup offering unprecedented statistical reach, with single event sensitivities down to $\mathcal{O}$ ($\mathrm{10^{-17}}$). Its successor experiment - PRISM, planned as the final stage, is expected to take this bound further down by two orders of magnitude. The electrons from standard model decay of bound muons are considered the most formidable physics background to the detection of these conversion electrons. Keeping in view the high stopped muon statistics for COMET and PRISM, the rate of charged current interaction of decay neutrinos with nuclear protons is also non-negligible. In this work, we perform a calculation of the positron event rates expected due to interactions of electron antineutrinos with Al target protons in the COMET setup. About $\mathrm{7\pm1}$ such $\mathrm{e^{+}}$ events per $\mathrm{10^{18}}$stopped muons are expected.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.