Paper detail

Neutrino-Flux Variability, Nuclear-Decay Variability, and Their Apparent Relationship

Homestake, Gallex and GNO data reveal variability of the solar neutrino flux. Kamiokande records for 1996-2001 reveal oscillations at 9.43 and 12.6 yr$^{-1}$, well within a range (6-16 yr$^{-1}$) that, according to helioseismology, may be related to internal solar rotation. A nuclear-decay experiment at Brookhaven National Laboratory (for 1982-86) reveals strong oscillations at 11.2 and 13.2 yr$^{-1}$. Similar oscillations are found in nuclear-decay measurements conducted by A. Parkhomov. By contrast, S. Pomme points out that nuclear-decay experiments at standards laboratories tend not to exhibit variability. The most extensive series of nuclear-decay measurements comes from an experiment initiated by G. Steinitz at the Geological Survey of Israel (2007-16), which recorded 340,000 radon-related measurements from each of 3 gamma detectors and 3 environmental sensors. Analysis of a subset of 85,000 hourly gamma measurements reveals a number of oscillation frequencies compatible with influences of internal solar rotation. There is no correlation between the gamma and environmental measurements. The solar internal magnetic field may lead to neutrino modulation by the RSFP (Resonant Spin-Flavor Precession) mechanism. A triplet of oscillations (7.43, 8.43 and 9.43 yr$^{-1}$) may be attributed to an internal region (presumably the core) with a sidereal rotation rate of 8.43 yr$^{-1}$ and a rotation axis roughly orthogonal to that of the photosphere. This suggests that the Sun had its origin in more than one stage of condensation of interplanetary material (one on top of another), which could lead to present-day layers with different metallicities, rotation rates and axes. The peak modulation occurs near local midnight in early June, suggestive of a role of cosmic neutrinos. These neutrinos could provide the mass attributed to dark matter for a neutrino mass of order 0.1 eV.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.