Paper detail

Neutrino-driven winds from neutron star merger remnants

We present a detailed, 3D hydrodynamics study of the neutrino-driven winds that emerge from the remnant of a NS merger. Our simulations are performed with the Newtonian, Eulerian code FISH, augmented by a detailed, spectral neutrino leakage scheme that accounts for heating due to neutrino absorption in optically thin conditions. Consistent with the 2D study of Dessart et al. (2009), we find that a strong baryonic wind is blown out along the original binary rotation axis within $100$ ms after the merger. We compute a lower limit on the expelled mass of $3.5 \times 10^{-3} M_{\odot}$, large enough to be relevant for heavy element nucleosynthesis. The physical properties vary significantly between different wind regions. For example, due to stronger neutrino irradiation, the polar regions show substantially larger $Y_e$ than those at lower latitudes. This has its bearings on the nucleosynthesis: the polar ejecta produce interesting r-process contributions from $A\sim 80$ to about 130, while the more neutron-rich, lower-latitude parts produce also elements up to the third r-process peak near $A\sim 195$. We also calculate the properties of electromagnetic transients that are powered by the radioactivity in the wind, in addition to the macronova transient that stems from the dynamic ejecta. The high-latitude (polar) regions produce UV/optical transients reaching luminosities up to $10^{41} {\rm erg \, s^{-1}}$, which peak around 1 day in optical and 0.3 days in bolometric luminosity. The lower-latitude regions, due to their contamination with high-opacity heavy elements, produce dimmer and more red signals, peaking after $\sim 2$ days in optical and infrared. Our numerical experiments indicate that it will be difficult to infer the collapse time-scale of the HMNS to a BH based on the wind electromagnetic transient, at least for collapse time-scales larger than the wind production time-scale.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.