Paper detail

Neutral selection

Hubbell's neutral theory of biodiversity has successfully explained the observed composition of many ecological communities but it relies on strict demographic equivalence among species and provides no room for evolutionary processes like selection, adaptation and speciation. Here we show how to embed the neutral theory within the Darwinian framework. In a fitness landscape with a quadratic maximum, typical of quantitative traits, selection restricts the extant species to have traits close to optimal, so that the fitness differences between surviving species are small. For sufficiently small mutation steps, the community structure fits perfectly to the Fisher log-series species abundance distribution. The theory is relatively insensitive to moderate amounts of environmental noise, wherein the location of the fitness maximum changes by amounts of order the width of the noise-free distribution. Adding very large environmental noise to the model qualitatively changes the abundance distributions, converting the exponential fall-off of large species to a power-law decay, typical of a neutral model with environmental noise.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.