Paper detail

Neutral hydrogen optical depth near star-forming galaxies at z~2.4 in the Keck Baryonic Structure Survey

[Abridged] We study the interface between galaxies and the intergalactic medium by measuring the absorption by neutral hydrogen in the vicinity of star-forming galaxies at z~2.4. Our sample consists of 679 rest-frame-UV selected galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts that have impact parameters < 2 (proper) Mpc to the line of sight of one of 15 bright, background QSOs. We present the first 2-D maps of the absorption around galaxies, plotting the median Ly-a pixel optical depth as a function of transverse and line of sight, LOS, separation from galaxies. The median optical depth, and hence the median density of atomic hydrogen, drops by more than an order of magnitude around 100 kpc, which is similar to the virial radius of the halos thought to host the galaxies. The median remains enhanced (>3 sigma level) out to at least 2.8 Mpc (i.e. > 9 comoving Mpc). Within 100 (200) kpc, and over \pm 165 km/s, the covering fraction of gas with Ly-a optical depth greater than unity is 100(+0)(-32)% (86(+14)(-18)%). Absorbers with tau(Ly-a)> 0.1 are typically closer to galaxies than random. The mean galaxy overdensity around absorbers increases with the optical depth and also as the length scale over which the galaxy overdensity is evaluated is decreased. Absorbers with tau(Ly-a)~1 reside in regions where the galaxy number density is close to the cosmic mean on scales > 0.25 Mpc. We detect two types of redshift space anisotropies. On scales < 200 km/s, or < 1 Mpc, the absorption is stronger along the LOS than in the transverse direction. This "finger of God" effect may be partly due to redshift errors, but is probably dominated by gas motions within or very close to the halos. On the other hand, on scales of 1.4 - 2.0 Mpc the absorption is compressed along the LOS (>3 sigma significance), which we attribute to large-scale infall (i.e. the Kaiser effect).

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.