Paper detail

Neutral hydrogen in galaxy halos at the peak of the cosmic star formation history

We use high-resolution cosmological zoom-in simulations from the FIRE project to make predictions for the covering fractions of neutral hydrogen around galaxies at z=2-4. These simulations resolve the interstellar medium of galaxies and explicitly implement a comprehensive set of stellar feedback mechanisms. Our simulation sample consists of 16 main halos covering the mass range M_h~10^9-6x10^12 Msun at z=2, including 12 halos in the mass range M_h~10^11-10^12 Msun corresponding to Lyman break galaxies (LBGs). We process our simulations with a ray tracing method to compute the ionization state of the gas. Galactic winds increase the HI covering fractions in galaxy halos by direct ejection of cool gas from galaxies and through interactions with gas inflowing from the intergalactic medium. Our simulations predict HI covering fractions for Lyman limit systems (LLSs) consistent with measurements around z~2-2.5 LBGs; these covering fractions are a factor ~2 higher than our previous calculations without galactic winds. The fractions of HI absorbers arising in inflows and in outflows are on average ~50% but exhibit significant time variability, ranging from ~10% to ~90%. For our most massive halos, we find a factor ~3 deficit in the LLS covering fraction relative to what is measured around quasars at z~2, suggesting that the presence of a quasar may affect the properties of halo gas on ~100 kpc scales. The predicted covering fractions, which decrease with time, peak at M_h~10^11-10^12 Msun, near the peak of the star formation efficiency in dark matter halos. In our simulations, star formation and galactic outflows are highly time dependent; HI covering fractions are also time variable but less so because they represent averages over large areas.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.