Paper detail

Neutral gas outflows in nearby [U]LIRGs via optical NaD feature

We studied the properties of the neutral gas in a sample of 38 local [U]LIRGs, which mainly covers the less explored LIRG luminosity range. This study is based on the analysis of the spatially integrated and spatially resolved spectra of the NaD feature obtained with the VIMOS/VLT-IFS. Analyzing spatially integrated spectra, we find that the contribution of stars to the observed NaD-EWs is generally small (<35%), and therefore this feature is dominated by ISM absorption. After subtracting the stellar contribution, we find that the pure-ISM integrated spectra generally show blueshifted NaD profiles, indicating neutral gas outflow velocities V in the range 65-260 km/s. Excluding galaxies with AGNs, V shows a dependency with the SFR of the type V \propto SFR^0.15 (in rather good agreement with previous results). The spatially resolved analysis was performed for 40 galaxies, 22 of which have neutral gas velocity fields dominated by noncircular motions with signatures of cone-like winds. However, a modest number of targets (11/40) show disk rotation. We found that the wind masses are in the range (0.4-7.5)x10^8 Msun, reaching up to 3% of the dynamical mass of the host. The mass rates are typically only 0.2-0.4 times the SFR indicating that, the mass loss is too small to slow down the SF significantly. In the majority of cases, the velocity of the outflowing gas is not sufficient to escape the host potential well and, therefore, most of the gas rains back into the disk. On average V/v(esc) is higher in less massive galaxies, confirming that the galaxy mass has a primary role in shaping the recycling of gas and metals. The comparison between the wind power and kinetic power of the starburst associated with SNe indicates that the starburst could drive the outflows in nearly all the [U]LIRGs galaxies, as the wind power is generally lower than 20% of the kinetic power supplied by the starburst.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.