Paper detail

Neural Graph Embedding Methods for Natural Language Processing

Knowledge graphs are structured representations of facts in a graph, where nodes represent entities and edges represent relationships between them. Recent research has resulted in the development of several large KGs. However, all of them tend to be sparse with very few facts per entity. In the first part of the thesis, we propose two solutions to alleviate this problem: (1) KG Canonicalization, i.e., identifying and merging duplicate entities in a KG, (2) Relation Extraction which involves automating the process of extracting semantic relationships between entities from unstructured text. Traditional Neural Networks like CNNs and RNNs are constrained to handle Euclidean data. However, graphs in Natural Language Processing (NLP) are prominent. Recently, Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) have been proposed to address this shortcoming and have been successfully applied for several problems. In the second part of the thesis, we utilize GCNs for Document Timestamping problem and for learning word embeddings using dependency context of a word instead of sequential context. In this third part of the thesis, we address two limitations of existing GCN models, i.e., (1) The standard neighborhood aggregation scheme puts no constraints on the number of nodes that can influence the representation of a target node. This leads to a noisy representation of hub-nodes which coves almost the entire graph in a few hops. (2) Most of the existing GCN models are limited to handle undirected graphs. However, a more general and pervasive class of graphs are relational graphs where each edge has a label and direction associated with it. Existing approaches to handle such graphs suffer from over-parameterization and are restricted to learning representation of nodes only.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.