Paper detail

Neural ensemble decoding for topological quantum error-correcting codes

Topological quantum error-correcting codes are a promising candidate for building fault-tolerant quantum computers. Decoding topological codes optimally, however, is known to be a computationally hard problem. Various decoders have been proposed that achieve approximately optimal error thresholds. Due to practical constraints, it is not known if there exists an obvious choice for a decoder. In this paper, we introduce a framework which can combine arbitrary decoders for any given code to significantly reduce the logical error rates. We rely on the crucial observation that two different decoding techniques, while possibly having similar logical error rates, can perform differently on the same error syndrome. We use machine learning techniques to assign a given error syndrome to the decoder which is likely to decode it correctly. We apply our framework to an ensemble of Minimum-Weight Perfect Matching (MWPM) and Hard-Decision Re-normalization Group (HDRG) decoders for the surface code in the depolarizing noise model. Our simulations show an improvement of 38.4%, 14.6%, and 7.1% over the pseudo-threshold of MWPM in the instance of distance 5, 7, and 9 codes, respectively. Lastly, we discuss the advantages and limitations of our framework and applicability to other error-correcting codes. Our framework can provide a significant boost to error correction by combining the strengths of various decoders. In particular, it may allow for combining very fast decoders with moderate error-correcting capability to create a very fast ensemble decoder with high error-correcting capability.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.