Paper detail

NeuraHealth: An Automated Screening Pipeline to Detect Undiagnosed Cognitive Impairment in Electronic Health Records with Deep Learning and Natural Language Processing

Dementia related cognitive impairment (CI) is a neurodegenerative disorder, affecting over 55 million people worldwide and growing rapidly at the rate of one new case every 3 seconds. 75% cases go undiagnosed globally with up to 90% in low-and-middle-income countries, leading to an estimated annual worldwide cost of USD 1.3 trillion, forecasted to reach 2.8 trillion by 2030. With no cure, a recurring failure of clinical trials, and a lack of early diagnosis, the mortality rate is 100%. Information in electronic health records (EHR) can provide vital clues for early detection of CI, but a manual review by experts is tedious and error prone. Several computational methods have been proposed, however, they lack an enhanced understanding of the linguistic context in complex language structures of EHR. Therefore, I propose a novel and more accurate framework, NeuraHealth, to identify patients who had no earlier diagnosis. In NeuraHealth, using patient EHR from Mass General Brigham BioBank, I fine-tuned a bi-directional attention-based deep learning natural language processing model to classify sequences. The sequence predictions were used to generate structured features as input for a patient level regularized logistic regression model. This two-step framework creates high dimensionality, outperforming all existing state-of-the-art computational methods as well as clinical methods. Further, I integrate the models into a real-world product, a web app, to create an automated EHR screening pipeline for scalable and high-speed discovery of undetected CI in EHR, making early diagnosis viable in medical facilities and in regions with scarce health services.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.