Paper detail

Network of Low-cost Air Quality Sensor for Monitoring Indoor, Outdoor, and Personal PM2.5 Exposure in Seattle during the 2020 Wildfire Season

The increased frequency of wildfires in the Western United States has raised public concerns. Exposure to wildfire smoke has been linked to an increased risk of cancer and cardiorespiratory morbidity. Evidence-driven interventions can alleviate the adverse health impact of wildfire smoke. Public health guidance during wildfires is based on regional air quality data with limited spatiotemporal resolution. We demonstrate the use of a network of low-cost particulate matter (PM) sensors to gather indoor, outdoor, and personal PM2.5 exposure data from seven locations in the urban Seattle area, along with a personal exposure monitor worn by a resident living in one of these locations during the 2020 Washington wildfire event. The data were used to determine PM concentration indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratios, PM reduction, and personal exposure levels. The result shows that locations equipped with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters and HVAC filtration systems had significantly lower I/O ratios (median I/O = 0.43) than those without air filtration (median I/O = 0.82). The median PM2.5 reduction for the locations with HEPA is 58 % compared to 20% for the locations without HEPA. The outdoor PM sensors showed a high correlation to the nearby regional air quality monitoring stations (R2 = 0.93). The personal monitor showed high variance in PM measurements as the user moved through different microenvironments and could not be fully characterized by the network of indoor or outdoor monitors. The findings imply evidence-based interventions can be developed for reducing pollution exposure based on the combination of indoor, outdoor sensors. Personal exposure monitoring in individuals' breathing zones provided the highest fidelity data capturing temporal spikes in PM exposure.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.