Paper detail

Network Flows that Solve Linear Equations

We study distributed network flows as solvers in continuous time for the linear algebraic equation $\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{H}\mathbf{y}$. Each node $i$ has access to a row $\mathbf{h}_i^{\rm T}$ of the matrix $\mathbf{H}$ and the corresponding entry $z_i$ in the vector $\mathbf{z}$. The first "consensus + projection" flow under investigation consists of two terms, one from standard consensus dynamics and the other contributing to projection onto each affine subspace specified by the $\mathbf{h}_i$ and $z_i$. The second "projection consensus" flow on the other hand simply replaces the relative state feedback in consensus dynamics with projected relative state feedback. Without dwell-time assumption on switching graphs as well as without positively lower bounded assumption on arc weights, we prove that all node states converge to a common solution of the linear algebraic equation, if there is any. The convergence is global for the "consensus + projection" flow while local for the "projection consensus" flow in the sense that the initial values must lie on the affine subspaces. If the linear equation has no exact solutions, we show that the node states can converge to a ball around the least squares solution whose radius can be made arbitrarily small through selecting a sufficiently large gain for the "consensus + projection" flow under fixed bidirectional graphs. Semi-global convergence to approximate least squares solutions is demonstrated for general switching directed graphs under suitable conditions. It is also shown that the "projection consensus" flow drives the average of the node states to the least squares solution with complete graph. Numerical examples are provided as illustrations of the established results.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.