Paper detail

Network Codes with Overlapping Chunks over Line Networks: A Case for Linear-Time Codes

In this paper, the problem of designing network codes that are both communicationally and computationally efficient over packet line networks with worst-case schedules is considered. In this context, random linear network codes (dense codes) are asymptotically capacity-achieving, but require highly complex coding operations. To reduce the coding complexity, Maymounkov et al. proposed chunked codes (CC). Chunked codes operate by splitting the message into non-overlapping chunks and send a randomly chosen chunk at each transmission time by a dense code. The complexity, that is linear in the chunk size, is thus reduced compared to dense codes. In this paper, the existing analysis of CC is revised, and tighter bounds on the performance of CC are derived. As a result, we prove that (i) CC with sufficiently large chunks are asymptotically capacity-achieving, but with a slower speed of convergence compared to dense codes; and (ii) CC with relatively smaller chunks approach the capacity with an arbitrarily small but non-zero constant gap. To improve the speed of convergence of CC, while maintaining their advantage in reducing the computational complexity, we propose and analyze a new CC scheme with overlapping chunks, referred to as overlapped chunked codes (OCC). We prove that for smaller chunks, which are advantageous due to lower computational complexity, OCC with larger overlaps provide a better tradeoff between the speed of convergence and the message or packet error rate. This implies that for smaller chunks, and with the same computational complexity, OCC outperform CC in terms of the speed of approaching the capacity for sufficiently small target error rate. In fact, we design linear-time OCC with very small chunks (constant in the message size) that are both computationally and communicationally efficient, and that outperform linear-time CC.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.