Paper detail

Nested spheroidal figures of equilibrium I. Approximate solutions for rigid rotations

We discuss the equilibrium conditions for a body made of two homogeneous components separated by oblate spheroidal surfaces and in relative motion. While exact solutions are not permitted for rigid rotation (unless a specific ambient pressure), approximations can be obtained for configurations involving a small confocal parameter. The problem then admits two families of solutions, depending on the pressure along the common interface (constant or quadratic with the cylindrical radius). We give in both cases the pressure and the rotation rates as a function of the fractional radius, ellipticities and mass-density jump. Various degrees of flattening are allowed but there are severe limitations for global rotation, as already known from classical theory (e.g. impossibility of confocal and coelliptical solutions, gradient of ellipticity outward). States of relative rotation are much less constrained, but these require a mass-density jump. This analytical approach compares successfully with the numerical solutions obtained from the Self-Consistent-Field method. Practical formula are derived in the limit of small ellipticities appropriate for slowly-rotating star/planet interiors.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.