Paper detail

Nested Canalyzing Functions And Their Average Sensitivities

In this paper, we obtain complete characterization for nested canalyzing functions (NCFs) by obtaining its unique algebraic normal form (polynomial form). We introduce a new concept, LAYER NUMBER for NCF. Based on this, we obtain explicit formulas for the the following important parameters: 1) Number of all the nested canalyzing functions, 2) Number of all the NCFs with given LAYER NUMBER, 3) Hamming weight of any NCF, 4) The activity number of any variable of any NCF, 5) The average sensitivity of any NCF. Based on these formulas, we show the activity number is greater for those variables in out layer and equal in the same layer. We show the average sensitivity attains minimal value when the NCF has only one layer. We also prove the average sensitivity for any NCF (No matter how many variables it has) is between 0 and 2. Hence, theoretically, we show why NCF is stable since a random Boolean function has average sensitivity $\frac{n}{2}$. Finally we conjecture that the NCF attain the maximal average sensitivity if it has the maximal LAYER NUMBER $n-1$. Hence, we guess the uniform upper bound for the average sensitivity of any NCF can be reduced to 4/3 which is tight.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.