Paper detail

Nest graphs and minimal complete symmetry groups for magic Sudoku variants

A symmetry group for Sudoku is complete if its action partitions the set of Sudoku boards into all possible orbits, and minimal if no group of smaller size would do the same. Previously, for a 4 x 4 Sudoku variation known as Shidoku, the authors used an analogous symmetry group to partition the set of Shidoku boards into so-called "nests" and then use the interplay between the physical and relabeling symmetries to find certain subgroups that were both complete and minimal. In this paper these same techniques are applied to find a minimal complete symmetry group for the modular magic Sudoku variation, as well as for another Sudoku variation called semi-magic Sudoku. The paper concludes with a simple computation which leads to the non-obvious fact that the full Sudoku symmetry group is, in fact, already minimal and complete.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.