Paper detail

Nernst Effect in Electron-Doped Pr$_{2-x}$Ce$_{x}$CuO$_4$

The Nernst effect of Pr$_{2-x}$Ce$_{x}$CuO$_4$ (x=0.13, 0.15, and 0.17) has been measured on thin film samples between 5-120 K and 0-14 T. In comparison to recent measurements on hole-doped cuprates that showed an anomalously large Nernst effect above the resistive T$_c$ and H$_{c2}$ \cite{xu,wang1,wang2,capan}, we find a normal Nernst effect above T$_c$ and H$_{c2}$ for all dopings. The lack of an anomalous Nernst effect in the electron-doped compounds supports the models that explain this effect in terms of amplitude and phase fluctuations in the hole-doped cuprates. In addition, the H$_{c2}$(T) determined from the Nernst effect shows a conventional behavior for all dopings. The energy gap determined from H$_{c2}$(0) decreases as the system goes from under-doping to over-dopingin agreement with the recent tunnelling experiments.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.