Paper detail

Nematic equilibria on a two-dimensional annulus: defects and energies

We study planar nematic equilibria on a two-dimensional annulus with strong and weak tangent anchoring, within the Oseen-Frank and Landau-de Gennes theories for nematic liquid crystals. We analyse the defect-free state in the Oseen-Frank framework and obtain analytic stability criteria in terms of the elastic anisotropy, annular aspect ratio and anchoring strength. We consider radial and azimuthal perturbations of the defect-free state separately, which yields a complete stability diagram for the defect-free state. We construct nematic equilibria with an arbitrary number of defects on a two-dimensional annulus with strong tangent anchoring and compute their energies; these equilibria are generalizations of the diagonal and rotated states observed in a square. This gives novel insights into the correlation between preferred numbers of defects, their locations and the geometry. In the Landau-de Gennes framework, we adapt Mironescu's powerful stability result in the Ginzburg-Landau framework (P. Mironescu, On the stability of radial solutions of the Ginzburg-Landau equation, 1995) to compute quantitative criteria for the local stability of the defect-free state in terms of the temperature and geometry.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.