Paper detail

Negative association, ordering and convergence of resampling methods

We study convergence and convergence rates for resampling schemes. Our first main result is a general consistency theorem based on the notion of negative association, which is applied to establish the almost-sure weak convergence of measures output from Kitagawa's (1996) stratified resampling method. Carpenter et al's (1999) systematic resampling method is similar in structure but can fail to converge depending on the order of the input samples. We introduce a new resampling algorithm based on a stochastic rounding technique of Srinivasan (2001), which shares some attractive properties of systematic resampling, but which exhibits negative association and therefore converges irrespective of the order of the input samples. We confirm a conjecture made by Kitagawa (1996) that ordering input samples by their states in $\mathbb{R}$ yields a faster rate of convergence; we establish that when particles are ordered using the Hilbert curve in $\mathbb{R}^d$, the variance of the resampling error is ${\scriptscriptstyle\mathcal{O}}(N^{-(1+1/d)})$ under mild conditions, where $N$ is the number of particles. We use these results to establish asymptotic properties of particle algorithms based on resampling schemes that differ from multinomial resampling.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.