Paper detail

Neck linker docking coordinates the kinetics of kinesin's heads

Conventional kinesin is a two-headed homodimeric motor protein, which is able to walk along microtubules processively by hydrolyzing ATP. Its neck linkers, which connect the two motor domains and can undergo a docking/undocking transition, are widely believed to play the key role in the coordination of the chemical cycles of the two motor domains and, consequently, in force production and directional stepping. Although many experiments, often complemented with partial kinetic modeling of specific pathways, support this idea, the ultimate test of the viability of this hypothesis requires the construction of a complete kinetic model. Considering the two neck linkers as entropic springs that are allowed to dock to their head domains and incorporating only the few most relevant kinetic and structural properties of the individual heads, here we develop the first detailed, thermodynamically consistent model of kinesin that can (i) explain the cooperation of the heads (including their gating mechanisms) during walking and (ii) reproduce much of the available experimental data (speed, dwell time distribution, randomness, processivity, hydrolysis rate, etc.) under a wide range of conditions (nucleotide concentrations, loading force, neck linker length and composition, etc.). Besides revealing the mechanism by which kinesin operates, our model also makes it possible to look into the experimentally inaccessible details of the mechanochemical cycle and predict how certain changes in the protein affect its motion.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.