Paper detail

Necessary condition on Lyapunov functions corresponding to the globally asymptotically stable equilibrium point

It is well known that, the existence of a Lyapunov function is a sufficient condition for stability, asymptotic stability, or global asymptotic stability of an equilibrium point of an autonomous system $\dot{\mathbf{x}} = f(\mathbf{x})$. In variants of Lyapunov theorems, the condition for a Lyapunov candidate $V$ (continuously differentiable and positive definite function) to be a Lyapunov function is that its time derivative along system trajectories must be negative semi-definite or negative definite. Numerically checking positive definiteness of $V$ is very difficult; checking negative definiteness of $\dot{V}(\cdot)=\langle \nabla V(\cdot), f(\cdot) \rangle$ is even more difficult, because it involves dynamics of the system. We give a necessary condition independent of the system dynamics, for every Lyapunov function corresponding to the globally asymptotically stable equilibrium point of $\dot{\mathbf{x}} = f(\mathbf{x})$. This necessary condition is numerically easier to check than checking positive definiteness of a function. Therefore, it can be used as a first level test to check whether a given continuously differentiable function is a Lyapunov function candidate or not. We also propose a method, which we call a generalized steepest descent method, to check this condition numerically. Generalized steepest descent method can be used for ruling out Lyapunov candidates corresponding to the globally asymptotically stable equilibrium point of $\dot{\mathbf{x}} = f(\mathbf{x})$. It can also be used as a heuristic to check the local positive definiteness of a function, which is a necessary condition for a Lyapunov function corresponding to a stable and/or asymptotically stable equilibrium point of an autonomous system.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.