Paper detail

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Frequency-Based Kelly Optimal Portfolio

In this paper, we consider a discrete-time portfolio with $m \geq 2$ assets optimization problem which includes the rebalancing~frequency as an additional parameter in the maximization. The so-called Kelly Criterion is used as the performance metric; i.e., maximizing the expected logarithmic growth of a trader's account, and the portfolio obtained is called the frequency-based Kelly optimal portfolio. The focal point of this paper is to extend upon the results of our previous work to obtain various optimality characterizations on the portfolio. To be more specific, using Kelly's criterion in our frequency-based formulation, we first prove necessary and sufficient conditions for the frequency-based Kelly optimal portfolio. With the aid of these conditions, we then show several new optimality characterizations such as expected ratio optimality and asymptotic relative optimality, and a result which we call the Extended Dominant Asset Theorem. That is, we prove that the $i$th asset is dominant in the portfolio if and only if the Kelly optimal portfolio consists of that asset only. The word "extended" on the theorem comes from the fact that it was only a sufficiency result that was proved in our previous work. Hence, in this paper, we improve it to involve a proof of the necessity part. In addition, the trader's survivability issue (no bankruptcy consideration) is also studied in detail in our frequency-based trading framework. Finally, to bridge the theory and practice, we propose a simple trading algorithm using the notion called dominant asset condition to decide when should one triggers a trade. The corresponding trading performance using historical price data is reported as supporting evidence.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.