Paper detail

Nearly $k$-distance sets

We say that a set of points $S\subset \mathbb{R}^d$ is an $\varepsilon$-nearly $k$-distance set if there exist $1\le t_1\le \ldots\le t_k,$ such that the distance between any two distinct points in $S$ falls into $[t_1,t_1+\varepsilon]\cup\ldots\cup[t_k,t_k+\varepsilon]$. In this paper, we study the quantity $M_k(d) = \lim_{\varepsilon\to 0}\max\{|S|\ :\ S\text{ is an }\varepsilon\text{-nearly } k \text{-distance set in } \mathbb{R}^d\}$ and its relation to the classical quantity $m_k(d)$: the size of the largest $k$-distance set in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We obtain that $M_k(d) = m_k(d)$ for $k=2,3$, as well as for any fixed $k$, provided that $d$ is sufficiently large. The last result answers a question, proposed by Erdős, Makai and Pach. We also address a closely related Turán-type problem, studied by Erdős, Makai, Pach, and Spencer in the 80's: given $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, how many pairs of them form a distance that belongs to $[t_1,t_1+1]\cup\ldots\cup[t_k,t_k+1],$ where $t_1,\ldots, t_k$ are fixed and any two points in the set are at distance at least $1$ apart? We establish the connection between this quantity and a quantity closely related to $M_k(d-1)$, as well as obtain an exact answer for the same ranges $k,d$ as above.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.