Paper detail

Nearby early-type galaxies with ionized gas. III. Analysis of line-strength indices with new stellar population models

In this paper we study the underlying stellar population of a sample of 65 nearby early-type galaxies predominantly located in low density environments. Ages, metallicities and [alpha/Fe] ratios have been derived through the comparison of Lick indices measured at different galacto-centric distances with new SSP models which account for the presence of alpha/Fe enhancement. The SSPs cover a wide range of ages, metallicities and [alpha/Fe] ratios. To derive the stellar population parameters we have devised an algorithm based on the probability density function. We derive a large spread in age ((1-15) Gyrs). Age does not show any significant trend with central velocity dispersion sigma_c but E galaxies appear on average older than S0. On the contrary, an increasing trend of metallicity and [alpha/Fe] with sigma_c is observed, testifying that the chemical enrichment was more efficient and the duration of the star formation shorter in more massive galaxies. We have also sought for possible correlations with the local galaxy density but neither metallicity nor alpha-enhancement show clear trends. However we find that while low density environments (LDE) contain very young objects (from 1 to 4 Gyr), none of the galaxies in the higher density environments (HDE) is younger than 5 Gyrs. Considering the lack of environmental effect on the [alpha/Fe] ratio and the high value of [alpha/Fe] in some young massive objects, we argue that young galaxies in LDE are more likely due to recent rejuvenation episodes. By comparing the number of rejuvenated objects with the total number of galaxies in our sample, and by means of simple two-SSP component models, we estimate that, on average, the rejuvenation episodes do not involve more than 25 % of the total galaxy mass.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.