Paper detail

Near-squares in binary recurrence sequences

We call an integer a \emph{near-square} if its absolute value is a square or a prime times a square. We investigate such near-squares in the binary recurrence sequences defined for integers $a \geq 3$ by $u_{0}(a)=0$, $u_{1}(a)=1$ and $u_{n+2}(a)=au_{n+1}(a)-u_{n}(a)$ for $n \geq 0$. We show that for a given $a \geq 3$, there is at most one $n \geq 5$ such that $u_{n}(a)$ is a near-square. With the exceptions of $u_{6}(3)=12^{2}$ and $u_{7}(6)=239 \cdot 13^{2}$, any such $u_{n}(a)$ can only be a near-square if $a \equiv 2 \bmod 4$, $n \equiv 3 \bmod 4$ is prime and $n \geq 19$. This is part of a more general phenomenon regarding near-squares in non-degenerate recurrence sequences defined for integers $a$ and $b=-b_{1}^{2}$ by $u_{0}(a,b)=0$, $u_{1}(a,b)=1$ and $u_{n+2}(a,b)=au_{n+1}(a,b)+bu_{n}(a,b)$ for $n \geq 0$ (see our Conjecture 1.1). It arises from a new Aurifeuillean-like factorization of elements of recurrence sequences that we have discovered (see relation (1.1)).

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.