Paper detail

Near-Optimal (Euclidean) Metric Compression

The metric sketching problem is defined as follows. Given a metric on $n$ points, and $ε>0$, we wish to produce a small size data structure (sketch) that, given any pair of point indices, recovers the distance between the points up to a $1+ε$ distortion. In this paper we consider metrics induced by $\ell_2$ and $\ell_1$ norms whose spread (the ratio of the diameter to the closest pair distance) is bounded by $Φ>0$. A well-known dimensionality reduction theorem due to Johnson and Lindenstrauss yields a sketch of size $O(ε^{-2} \log (Φn) n\log n)$, i.e., $O(ε^{-2} \log (Φn) \log n)$ bits per point. We show that this bound is not optimal, and can be substantially improved to $O(ε^{-2}\log(1/ε) \cdot \log n + \log\log Φ)$ bits per point. Furthermore, we show that our bound is tight up to a factor of $\log(1/ε)$. We also consider sketching of general metrics and provide a sketch of size $O(n\log(1/ε)+ \log\log Φ)$ bits per point, which we show is optimal.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.