Paper detail

Near-MDS Codes from Maximal Arcs in PG$(2,q)$

The singleton defect of an $[n,k,d]$ linear code ${\cal C}$ is defined as $s({\cal C})=n-k+1-d$. Codes with $S({\cal C})=0$ are called maximum distance separable (MDS) codes, and codes with $S(\cal C)=S(\cal C ^{\bot})=1$ are called near maximum distance separable (NMDS) codes. Both MDS codes and NMDS codes have good representations in finite projective geometry. MDS codes over $F_q$ with length $n$ and $n$-arcs in PG$(k-1,q)$ are equivalent objects. When $k=3$, NMDS codes of length $n$ are equivalent to $(n,3)$-arcs in PG$(2,q)$. In this paper, we deal with the NMDS codes with dimension 3. By adding some suitable projective points in maximal arcs of PG$(2,q)$, we can obtain two classes of $(q+5,3)$-arcs (or equivalently $[q+5,3,q+2]$ NMDS codes) for any prime power $q$. We also determine the exact weight distribution and the locality of such NMDS codes and their duals. It turns out that the resultant NMDS codes and their duals are both distance-optimal and dimension-optimal locally recoverable codes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.