Paper detail

Near-Infrared Survey of the GOODS-North Field: Search for Luminous Galaxy Candidates at z=>6.5

We present near-infrared (NIR; J & Ks) survey of the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey-North (GOODS-N) field. The publicly available imaging data were obtained using the MOIRCS instrument on the 8.2m Subaru and the WIRCam instrument on the 3.6m Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT). These observations fulfill a serious wavelength gap in the GOODS-N data - i.e., lack of deep NIR observations. We combine the Subaru/MOIRCS and CFHT/WIRCam archival data to generate deep J and Ks band images, covering the full GOODS-N field (~169 sq. arcmin) to an AB magnitude limit of ~25 mag (3sigma). We applied z'-band dropout color selection criteria, using the NIR data generated here. We have identified two possible Lyman Break Galaxy (LBG) candidates at z\gtrsim6.5 with J\lesssim24.5. The first candidate is a likely LBG at z\sim6.5 based on a weak spectral feature tentatively identified as Lyalpha line in the deep Keck/DEIMOS spectrum, while the second candidate is a possible LBG at z\sim7 based on its photometric redshift. These z'-dropout objects, if confirmed, are among the brightest such candidates found so far. At z\gtrsim6.5, their star formation rate is estimated as 100-200 solar mass per year. If they continue to form stars at this rate, they assemble a stellar mass of ~5x10^10 solar mass after about 400 million years, becoming the progenitors of massive galaxies observed at z\sim5. We study the implication of the z'-band dropout candidates discovered here, in constraining the bright-end of the luminosity function and understanding the nature of high redshift galaxies.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.