Paper detail

Near infrared star counts as a test of Galactic bar structure

We present survey data in the narrow-band L filter (nbL), taken at UKIRT, for a total area of 277 square arcmin, roughly equally divided between four regions at zero Galactic latitude and longitudes +-4.3 deg and +-2.3 deg. The 80% completeness level for these observations is at roughly magnitude 11.0. This magnitude limit, owing to the low coefficient for interstellar extinction at this wavelength (A(nbL)=0.047 A(V)), allows us to observe bulge giants. We match the nbL-magnitudes with DENIS survey K magnitudes, and find 95 per cent of nbL sources are matched to K sources. Constructing colour-magnitude diagrams, we deredden the magnitudes and find evidence for a longitude dependent asymmetry in the source counts. We find that there are ~15% and ~5% more sources at the negative longitude than at the corresponding positive longitude, for the fields at +-4.3 deg and +-2.3 deg respectively. This is compared with the predictions of some Galactic bar models. We find an asymmetry in the expected sense, which favours gas dynamical models and the recent deconvolution of surface photometry data (Binney et al. 1991; Binney, Gerhard & Spergel 1997), over earlier treatments of photometric data (e.g. Dwek et al. 1995).

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.