Paper detail

Near Infrared spectroscopy of post-starburst galaxies: a limited impact of TP-AGB stars on galaxy SEDs

We present VLT-ISAAC NIR spectro-photometric observations of 16 post-starburst (PSB) galaxies aimed at constraining the debated influence of TP-AGB stars on the SED of galaxies with stellar ages of 0.5-2 Gyr, critical for high-redshift studies. PSB galaxies have negligible on-going star formation and a SED dominated by the stars formed in a recent (<2 Gyr) burst. By spectroscopically selecting PSB galaxies with mean luminosity-weighted ages between 0.5 and 1.5 Gyr and a broad range of metallicities, we explore the parameter space around the peak of the relative energy output of TP-AGB stars. Crucially, we target galaxies at z~0.2, so that two main spectral features of TP-AGB stars (C-molecule band-head drops at 1.41 and 1.77mum), which are heavily absorbed by our atmosphere for targets at z~0, move inside the H and K atmospheric windows and can be constrained for the first time to high accuracy. Our findings provide key constraints to stellar population synthesis models: i) The NIR regions around 1.41 and 1.77mum (rest-frame) are featureless for all galaxies in our sample over the whole range of relevant ages and metallicities at variance with the Maraston (2005) TP-AGB heavy models, which exhibit marked drops there; ii) No flux boosting is observed in the NIR. The optical-NIR SEDs of most of our PSB galaxies can be consistently reproduced with Bruzual & Charlot (2003) models, using either simple stellar populations of corresponding light-weighted ages and metallicities, or a more realistic burst plus an old population containing <~60% of the total stellar mass. In contrast, all combinations of this kind based on the Maraston (2005) models are unable to simultaneously reproduce the smoothness of the NIR spectra and the relatively blue optical-NIR colours in the observations. The data collected in this study appear to disfavour TP-AGB heavy models with respect to TP-AGB light ones.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.