Paper detail

Near-infrared Extinction due to Cool Supernova Dust in Cassiopeia A

We present the results of extinction measurements toward the main ejecta shell of the Cassiopeia A supernova (SN) remnant using the flux ratios between the two near-infrared (NIR) [Fe II] lines at 1.26 and 1.64 $μ{\rm m}$. We find a clear correlation between the NIR extinction ($E(J-H)$) and the radial velocity of ejecta knots, showing that redshifted knots are systematically more obscured than blueshifted ones. This internal "self-extinction" strongly indicates that a large amount of SN dust resides inside and around the main ejecta shell. At one location in the southern part of the shell, we measure $E(J-H)$ by the SN dust of 0.23$\pm$0.05 mag. By analyzing the spectral energy distribution of thermal dust emission at that location, we show that there are warm ($\sim$100 K) and cool ($\sim$40 K) SN dust components and that the latter is responsible for the observed $E(J-H)$. We investigate the possible grain species and size of each component and find that the warm SN dust needs to be silicate grains such as MgSiO$_{3}$, Mg$_{2}$SiO$_{4}$, and SiO$_{2}$, whereas the cool dust could be either small ($\leq$0.01 $μ{\rm m}$) Fe or large ($\geq$0.1 $μ{\rm m}$) Si grains. We suggest that the warm and cool dust components in Cassiopeia A represent grain species produced in diffuse SN ejecta and in dense ejecta clumps, respectively.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.