Paper detail

Near-Contemporaneous Optical Spectroscopic and Infrared Photometric Observations of Candidate Herbig Ae/Be Stars in the Magellanic Clouds

We present near-IR (J,H,Ks) photometry for 27 of the 28 candidate Herbig Ae/Be stars in the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds identified via the EROS1 and EROS2 surveys as well as near-contemporaneous optical (H-alpha) spectroscopy for 21 of these 28 candidates. Our observations extend previous efforts to determine the evolutionary status of these objects. We compare the IR brightness and colors of a subset of our sample with archival ground-based IR data and find evidence of statistically significant photometric differences for ELHC 5, 7, 12, 18, and 21 in one or more filter. In all cases, these near-IR photometric variations exhibit a grey color as compared to earlier epoch data. The ~1 magnitude IR brightening and minimal change in the H-alpha emission strength we observe in ELHC 7 is consistent with previous claims that it is a UX Ori type HAe/Be star, which is occasionally obscurred by dust clouds. We also detect a ~1 magnitude IR brightening of ELHC 12, but find little evidence of a similar large-scale change in its H-alpha line strength, suggesting that its behavior could also be caused by a UX Ori-like event. The ~0.5 magnitude IR variability we observe for ELHC 21, which also exhibited little evidence of a change in its H-alpha emission strength, could conceivably be caused by a major recent enhancement in the density of the inner disk region of a classical Be star. We also report the first near-IR photometry for two ESHC stars and the first H-alpha spectroscopy for one ELHC and five ESHC stars. Although H-alpha emission is detected in all of these new observations, they do not exhibit a strong near-IR excess. It is therefore possible that many of these objects may be classical Be stars rather than Herbig Ae/Be stars.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.