Paper detail

Nature of the $X(6900)$ in partial wave decomposition of $J/ψJ/ψ$ scattering

In this letter, we perform partial wave decomposition on coupled-channel scattering amplitudes, $J/ψJ/ψ$-$J/ψψ(2S)$-$J/ψψ(3770)$, to study the resonance appears in these processes. Effective Lagrangians are used to describe the interactions of four charmed vector mesons, and the scattering amplitudes are calculated up to the next-to-leading order. Partial wave projections are performed, and unitarization is implemented by Padé approximation. Then we fit the amplitudes to the $J/ψJ/ψ$ invariant mass spectra measured by LHCb and determine the unknown couplings. The pole parameters of the $X(6900)$ are extracted as $M=6861.0^{+6.3}_{-8.8}$~MeV and $Γ=129.0^{+5.6}_{-3.4}$~MeV. Our analysis implies that its quantum number prefers to be $0^{++}$. The pole counting rule and phase shifts show that it is a normal Breit-Wigner resonance and, hence, should be a compact tetraquark.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.