Paper detail

Natural selection from the perspective of mathematical and physical laws

The theory of evolution by natural selection cannot be used to evaluate the truth value of the following proposition: Through evolution, there exists at least one species that can adapt to any one given environment. To address this issue, this study attempted to define natural selection from the perspective of mathematical and physical laws. This study roughly classified biological activities into molecular, cellular, individual, ecological, and biogeochemical (atomic) levels according to scale and complexity, and selected typical phenomena from each level to analyze the relationship between adaptive evolution and several laws of mathematics and physics. Then, we proposed that natural selection favors heritable variations that allows organisms to better use and/or hide the laws in a certain environment. Reproductive advantage is by far the most obvious consequence of natural selection. Moreover, adaptive evolution can lead to the emergence of laws that ensures that each law only controls some properties of organisms. This study found that organisms significantly influence themselves in all five levels of biological activities, and the whole biosphere can be considered as a huge and evolution-driven feedback loop. Organisms can carry more laws than non-living matter, but the carrying capacity is limited. Therefore, this study's findings suggest that adaptive evolution makes organisms subject to more laws of mathematics and physics until the highest carrying capacity is reached.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.