Paper detail

Natural, R-parity violating supersymmetry and horizontal flavor symmetries

The absence so far of any supersymmetric signals at the LHC pushes towards a rethinking of the assumptions underlying the MSSM. Because the large missing $E_T$ searches are inadequate to detect a LSP decaying within the detector, R-parity violating supersymmetry is still a good candidate for low energy, natural supersymmetry. We show that, in Froggatt-Nielsen-like models of horizontal symmetries, specific textures for the R-parity violating couplings are dictated by the symmetry, with the largest coupling involving the third generation fields. Lepton number can be an accidental symmetry of the renormalizable superpotential and barion number violation is given by a $\bar u\bar d\bar d$ operator. The collider phenomenology then mimics the main features of MFV R-parity violating supersymmetry. The LSP can evade current LHC supersymmetry searches, is allowed to be well below 1 TeV and at the same time all the constraints from proton decay and other low energy decays can be satisfied; in particular, dimension five operators allowed by R-parity but dangerous for the proton are under control, while neutrino masses are generated by the Weinberg operator. Assuming sub TeV ({\it natural}) superpartners, we obtain both upper and lower limits on the magnitude of the dominant R-parity violating coupling: a lower limit of order $10^{-9}$ arises from null LHC searches on R-hadrons and heavy stable charged particles, while a upper limit of order $10^{-3}$ follows from constraints on low-energy flavor changing neutral currents. Displaced vertices are predicted in the lower end of this range.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.