Paper detail

Native point defects in CuIn$_{1-x}$Ga$_x$Se$_{2}$: hybrid density functional calculations predict origin of p- and n-type conductivity

We have performed a first-principles study of the p- and n-type conductivity in CuIn$_{1-x}$Ga$_x$Se$_{2}$ due to native point defects, based on the HSE06 hybrid functional. Band alignment shows that the band gap becomes larger with $x$ due to the increasing conduction band minimum, rendering it hard to establish n-type conductivity in CuGaSe$_{2}$. From the defect formation energies, we find that In/Ga$_{\mathrm{Cu}}$ is a shallow donor, while V$_{\mathrm{Cu}}$, V$_{\mathrm{In}/\mathrm{Ga}}$ and Cu$_{\mathrm{In}/\mathrm{Ga}}$ act as shallow acceptors. Using total charge neutrality of ionized defects and intrinsic charge carriers to determine the Fermi level, we show that under In-rich growth conditions In$_{\mathrm{Cu}}$ causes strongly n-type conductivity in CuInSe$_{2}$. Under In-poor growth conditions the conductivity type in CuInSe$_{2}$ alters to p-type and compensation of the acceptors by In$_{\mathrm{Cu}}$ reduces, as observed in photoluminescence experiments. In CuGaSe$_{2}$, the native acceptors pin the Fermi level far away from the conduction band minimum, thus inhibiting n-type conductivity. On the other hand, CuGaSe$_{2}$ shows strong p-type conductivity under a wide range of Ga-poor growth conditions. Maximal p-type conductivity in CuIn$_{1-x}$Ga$_x$Se$_{2}$ is reached under In/Ga-poor growth conditions, in agreement with charge concentration measurements on samples with In/Ga-poor stoichiometry, and is primarily due to the dominant acceptor Cu$_{\mathrm{In}/\mathrm{Ga}}$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.