Paper detail

Narrow-line region gas kinematics of 24,264 optically-selected AGN: the radio connection

Using a sample of 24264 optically selected AGNs from the SDSS DR7 database, we characterise how the profile of the [OIII] emission line relates to bolometric luminosity (L_Bol), Eddington ratio, radio loudness, radio luminosity (L_Rad) and optical class (Sy 1/2) to determine what drives the kinematics of this kpc-scale line emitting gas. Spectral stacking is used to characterise how the average [OIII] profile changes as a function of these variables. After accounting for the correlation between L_Bol and L_Rad, we report that L_Rad has the strongest influence on the [OIII] profile, with moderate radio luminosity AGNs (log(L_Rad)=23-25 W/Hz) having the broadest [OIII] profiles. When binned according to Eddington ratio, only AGNs in our highest bin (i.e., R_Edd>0.3) show any signs of having broadened [OIII] profiles, although the small numbers of such extreme AGNs mean we cannot rule out that other processes (e.g., radio jets) are responsible for this broadening. We find no significant difference between the [OIII] profiles of broad and narrow-line Seyfert 1s. The [OIII] profiles of Sy 1 and 2 AGNs show the same trends in terms of line width, but Sy 1 AGNs display a much stronger blue wing, which we interpret as evidence of outflowing ionised gas. Using multi-component line fitting we calculate the proportions of AGNs with broad [OIII] profiles, finding that moderate radio luminosity AGNs are roughly 5 times more likely to have extremely broad [OIII] lines (FWHM>1000km/s) compared to lower L_Rad AGNs. Our results are consistent with the most disturbed gas kinematics being induced by compact radio cores (rather than powerful radio jets), although broadened [OIII] lines are also present, but much rarer, in low L_Rad systems (<10^23 W/Hz). Our catalogue of multi-component fits is freely available as an online resource.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.